Swivel Business

Have you tried Swivel Business?

Long-term Unemployment

Official_source
444916471_bd20314df3_mBy OECD on Apr 16, 2007
Viewed 1728 times
115610298_6349046436_o

Long-term unemployment

Long-term unemployment is here measured as those who have been unemployed for 12 months or more as a percentage of the total number of persons unemployed. Clearly, long-term unemployment is of particular concern to policy makers. Quite apart from the mental stress caused to the unemployed and their families, high rates of long-term unemployment indicate that labour markets are operating inefficiently and, in countries which pay generous unemployment benefits, the existence of long-term unemployment is a significant burden on government finances.

Definition

Long-term unemployment is conventionally defined either as those unemployed for 6 months or more or, as here, those unemployed for 12 months or more.

Unemployment is defined in most OECD countries according to the ILO Guidelines. Unemployment is usually measured by household labour force surveys and the unemployed are defined as those persons who report that they have worked in gainful employment for less than one hour in the previous week, who are available for work and who have taken actions to seek employment in the previous four weeks. The ILO Guidelines specify the kinds of actions that count as seeking work.

Comparability

All OECD countries use the ILO Guidelines for measuring unemployment, but the operational definitions used in national labour force surveys vary slightly in Iceland and Turkey. Unemployment levels are also likely to be affected by changes in the survey design and/or the survey conduct, but unemployment rates are likely to be fairly consistent over time.

In comparing rates of long-term unemployment, it is important to bear in mind differences in institutional arrangements between countries. Rates of long-term unemployment will generally be higher in countries where unemployment benefits are relatively generous and are available for long periods of unemployment. In countries where the benefits are low and of limited duration, unemployed persons will more quickly lower their salary expectations or consider taking jobs that are in other ways less attractive than those which they formerly held.


Long-term trends

In 2005, rates of long-term unemployment varied from 10% or less in Canada, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand and Norway to 50% or more in the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland and the Slovak Republic. Lower rates of long-term unemployment are generally found in countries that have enjoyed relatively high rates of economic growth in recent years. There appears to be a two-way causal relationship here – on the one hand, jobs are easier to find in a fast growing economy and, on the other, economies may grow faster by making unemployment an unattractive proposition.

Over the period shown in the table, long-term unemployment rates have been relatively stable for the OECD as a whole, but there have been some sharp rises in several countries and equally sharp falls in others. Rates of long-term unemployment have more than doubled in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Japan. On the other hand, since 1992, the share of long-term unemployed has more than halved in Korea, Norway and New Zealand.

Source

Further information

Analytical publications

Statistical publications

Online databases

Websites

Data Summary

Showing last 6 rows and first 4 columns
Date Australia Austria Belgium Canada Czech-Republic Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak-Republic Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States EU 15 total OECD total Slovenia
Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear
2000 25.5 25.8 56.3 11.2 48.8 20.0 29.0 42.6 51.5 56.4 49.0 11.8 61.3 25.5 2.3 22.4 1.1 19.3 5.4 37.9 42.9 54.6 47.6 26.4 29.0 21.1 28.0 6.0 46.9 31.5 62.4
2001 22.0 23.3 51.7 9.5 52.7 22.2 26.2 37.6 50.4 52.8 46.6 12.5 33.1 63.4 26.6 2.3 28.4 1.1 16.7 5.5 43.1 38.1 53.7 44.0 22.3 29.9 21.3 27.8 6.1 45.3 29.6 61.4
2002 22.3 19.2 49.6 9.6 50.7 19.7 24.4 33.8 47.9 52.7 44.8 11.1 29.4 59.2 30.8 2.5 27.4 0.9 26.7 14.5 6.4 48.4 35.5 59.8 40.2 21.0 21.8 29.4 22.9 8.5 41.5 29.6 57.7
2003 21.3 24.5 46.3 10.0 49.9 19.9 24.7 42.9 50.0 56.3 42.2 8.1 35.5 58.2 33.5 0.6 24.9 1.0 29.2 13.5 6.4 49.7 32.8 61.1 39.8 17.8 26.3 24.4 22.8 11.8 43.4 30.9 55.5
2004 20.5 27.6 49.6 9.5 51.8 22.6 23.4 41.7 51.8 54.8 45.1 11.2 34.3 49.7 33.7 1.1 20.8 1.1 32.5 11.7 9.2 47.9 43.2 60.6 37.7 18.9 33.5 39.2 21.4 12.7 42.4 31.9 52.7
2005 17.7 25.3 51.6 9.6 53.6 25.9 24.9 42.5 54.0 53.7 46.1 34.3 52.2 33.3 0.8 26.3 2.4 40.1 9.4 9.5 52.2 48.6 68.1 32.6 38.8 39.6 22.4 11.8 43.8 32.8 49.2
more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more... more...

Recent Comments

No one's commented yet. Have something to say?

Popular Graphs

Column Summaries

Show columns: 1 - 4 5 - 8 9 - 12 ... 33 - 34
Date
Clear
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, and Czech-Republic

see all graphs

1968 to 2005
(37 years)
Yearly
Australia
Clear
Australia

see all graphs

36.7
25.55
14.6
715.4
5.75
Austria
Clear
Austria

see all graphs

30.3
25.425
18.4
305.1
3.59
Belgium
Clear
Belgium

see all graphs

76.2
61.2739
46.3
1,409.3
8.34