I wonder if the decrease in unidentified persons might be related to decreased crime rates or innovations in forensics that might make it easier to identify remains.
According to BJS: "Of the 2,900 National Crime Information Center records that contained data on the manner of death, 27% were ruled homicides; 12%, accidental deaths; 7%, natural causes; and 5%, suicides." Since we're only talking about a few hundred unidentified individuals total per year, 27% of them would be such a small number that comparisons to the crime rate would probably not be valid. Forensics improvements *would* make sense, although I'm not aware of evidence in support of it (haven't looked either).
I really like the improved forensic science theory. Wasn't DNA matching beginning to be widely used in the early 90's?
Since so many of the incidents are from Texas and California, I would have expected to see a subtle decline post 2001, as stepped up border security would have resulted in more crossers being intercepted before they had the chance to perish in the desert.
posted 12 months ago
Would you like to comment?
Sign in to leave a comment. Or, sign up if you don't have an account.
Comments (3)
Would you like to comment?
Sign in to leave a comment. Or, sign up if you don't have an account.