Again, not a line graph. This is a very strange website to not be able to identify that this is a change over time.
Though I suppose since the months are named, they are viewed as levels of a categorical variable, rather than levels of the subgroup of categorical variables that includes time...like months. But seriously, it should check the explanatory variables (if categorical) against a list of months and other time-related variables (and abbreviations of months, which may be why it screwed up) and assign them numerical values so as to emulate a quantitative variable and allow for a line graph. Actually, a scatterplot would be better.
Unfortunately, the site will identify the text of months as just text. Swivel can identify changes over time, if the date is entered in a certain format. In this case, all you would have to do is add the year.
Comments (2)
Would you like to comment?
Sign in to leave a comment. Or, sign up if you don't have an account.