Emily Qiu, Elissa Trieu, and Sarah Mitchell

346563918_133cf8085c_s
Emily Qiu, Elissa Trieu, and Sarah Mitchell

Shout outs to Emily Qiu, Elissa Trieu, and Sarah Mitchell

Natalie: Welcome to Swivel! 4 months ago

Emily Qiu, Elissa Trieu, and Sarah Mitchell: noo, we're not that bad. just emily. emily = 1/23. and hopefully sarah and elissa are like 5/23? 4 months ago

The Yellow River Speaks (Daniel Reynolds): So if you're "1/23" all together, then are each one of you 1/69th???? 4 months ago

About Me

YAY CHEM+!!!

Featured Graphs

Emily Qiu, Elissa Trieu, and Sarah Mitchell did not select any graphs to feature.

Featured Data Sets

Emily Qiu, Elissa Trieu, and Sarah Mitchell did not select any datasets to feature.

Recent Comments

129980202_50f64a28eb_m
Hexane and Octane
Removal Data..
cbhave: It was a mistake in the spreadsheet. I put number type as percentage but inputed a whole number, thus, we get 8000%! (4 months ago)
Emily Qiu, Elissa Trieu, and Sarah Mitchell: Wow, these removal methods seem pretty effective, judging by the fact that they remove about 90% total. What are the current removal methods? (4 months ago)
scottmcclellanakathestorminmormon: Whoa. That is a very effective method to removing hexane and octane, seeing as each removes at least three quarters of the given feed. Do you know exactly what the method is? Maybe it could be applied to other air pollution factors. (4 months ago)
2363345_da147122ff_m
How Municiple Water
is Treated Over Ti..
scottmcclellanakathestorminmormon: It's good to see that our water is being treated more and more as the years have passed. It's actually kind of shocking that almost half of the municipal water had no treatment in the mid-90s. I'm glad now to see that the city has taken more care to the cleanliness of the water that is so widely utilized. (4 months ago)
Emily Qiu, Elissa Trieu, and Sarah Mitchell: city water. basically what comes out of the water faucets (4 months ago)
Band of Stability:Manganese: I agree with Scott. However, I am unsure of the difference between primary and secondary treatment. Is there a difference? (4 months ago)
233508614_52027e9e6f_m
The Percent of
Population With Mu..
Caroline Newcomb: I have to agree with Courtney that its interesting that its weird that 1996 has the highest percentage of water that met standards, esp. since there was a five percent increase from the year before. I wonder if the standards became stricter, or if there was some enviornmental factor the affected the water in the area(s). (4 months ago)
Emily Qiu, Elissa Trieu, and Sarah Mitchell: courtney/caroline: i'm not sure if the government cut back or anything, but around that time was when there were big water reforms, so it might have been a big start or something. 1996 was the year of the New Zealand Water Supply Conference and the New Zealand National Soils Conference zoe: yes, what meets standards. marina: yes, it means a quarter of the people don't have water that meets standards. however, this does not necessarily mean that it is unclean, just not clean enough. yes, it might be because they get it themselves lizzieB: the federal regulations for water in new zealand are found on http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/water/nz-drinking-water-standards-00.html wil: That makes sense, i'm not really sure though meredith: that's a good point, since this data is averaged and is probably really different by area (4 months ago)
Ryan "liQuiD_SiLk" Meng: As far as I know, New Zealand is one of the cleanest countries in the world. To have only 75% of the water up to par leaves the question of how safe it is to be drinking water in the US. And bottled water isn't the answer. (4 months ago)